This video will help you understand the concepts of gpl. Gnu general public license this license, commonly known as the gpl, has two versions that are actively and widely used in many open source communities. You may copy, distribute and modify the software as long as you track changesdates of in source files and keep modifications under gpl. Distributing commercial software on a linux virtual appliance. Wondering how open source licensing affects linux containers. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it. Android uses linux as its kernel, but does not include gnu software, and includes proprietary software on top, which make it very. Yolinux list of linux databases and database related links. Gnu make sure that any software source code licensed under it have to make originating source code open and freely availble to all its users. Many commercial software developers argue that this user written loadable kernel module is not based on linux or a derivative of linux, but is separate and independent and they should not be compelled to license it under gpl. Gnu general public license, version 3 spdx short identifier. Business analytics software data analysis, report generation and information delivery. Opensource gpl is pacmanlike microsoft chairman bill gates plunges into the ongoing opensource tussle, saying there are problems for commercial users with the general public license. Phrases such as free software, open source software, or proprietary software are totally independent of whether or not the software is commercial or not.
Our company needs to buy and use a proprietary software to get a. Stallman devised an alternative to the commercial software license and called it the gpl, or gnu public license. Jan 16, 2004 the answer to both questions is the gpl, or gnu general public license, the software license that governs the linux kernel and other opensource software. The intricacies of using the gpl license have been hashed out repeatedly in many other forums.
Instead, such companies should embrace linux as an exceptional development platform, one that is free as water and much more stable. The gpl is the worlds most popular open source software license, currently used by nearly 50% of all open source software, including such software as the linux operating system kernel, the firefox web browser, and the mysql relational database management system. Jono bacon proposes the change is due to increased growth in open source in business, and a nervousness around the gpl in the commercial world. The vast majority of questions i get about combining gpl and proprietary software concern embedded systems, since linux is a component of so many consumer products these days. The most widespread such license is the gnu general public license, or gnu gpl for short. This discussion is aimed in getting a brief understanding of what gnulinux is and what are the various types of software licenses. In the proprietary software world, rarely are two licenses ever compatible.
A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law center. Prior to that version, it was not under the gpl, but a different licence that prohibited commercial use, failing your other criterion. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula kris occhipinti. Linux is a cancer contaminates all other software with hippie gpl rubbish. Software can be licensed with the gpl or bsd license, and yet have profit as a chief aim, such as with red hat software. Software is published in one of these components based on whether or not it meets our free software philosophy, and the level of support we can provide for it. This means, yes, you are free to bundle gpl softwareos along with your commercialclosed sourceproprietary software provided you pass the same freedoms of the gpl software onto your users. The license was originally written by richard stallman of the free software foundation fsf for the gnu project.
Can gpl licenced software be used in corporate environments. The past, present and future of the gpl in open source software. The gnu general public license gnu gpl or gpl is a widelyused free software license, which guarantees end users the freedom to run, study, share and modify the software. What is the difference between gpl, agpl and lgpl licenses. Gpl linux av tech corporation avi321 contains code which is developed by thirdpartycompanies and which are subject to the gnu general public license gpl or the gnu lesser public licence lgpl. Examples of software commonly used under the gpl are the linux kernel and the rest of the gnu linux operating system, including the gcc compiler, git, filezilla and wordpress, just to name a few. Qgis is a user friendly open source geographic information system gis licensed under the gnu general public. Examples of software commonly used under the gpl are the linux kernel. The agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint.
Apr 08, 2016 this discussion is aimed in getting a brief understanding of what gnu linux is and what are the various types of software licenses. The word commercial is a bit vague in its meaning since no solid lined. The firefox browser uses a similar copyleft license. The big question now is whether the most prominent gpl project, the linux kernel at the heart of the opensource operating system that often bears the. Some companies, such as mysql ab, exist by duallicensing their software. Apr 17, 2010 the agpl makes straightforward commercial sense we use it for our open source product, flint.
This page presents the opinion of some debianlegal contributors on how certain licenses follow the debian free software guidelines dfsg. If software is licenced under a gpl license, can it be used without restriction in a corporatecommercial environment. There can thus not be a linux distribution that does not include gpl software and allows commercial use. Linus torvalds says gpl v3 violates everything that gplv2 stood for duration. This page is maintained by the free software foundations licensing and compliance lab.
This can be further shortened to gpl, when it is understood that the gnu gpl is the one intended. We do not want to violate the gpl, and we do not want to open source our own ip a. And yet this is the shaky basis on which ballmer dismisses open source as anathema to all commercial. Its impressive, for instance, to look at sonys web site where they fulfill their gpl obligation, and see the dozens of tv models and many other products that contain linux. If you disagree with the above, please dont use mpd, linux or anything else under the gpl. We do not want to violate the gpl, and we do not want to open source our own ip at this time. The software included in this product contains ed software that is licensed under the gpl. We welcome enquiries from maintainers considering particular licenses, but we. Qt documentation is available under commercial licenses from the qt company, and under the terms of the gnu free documentation license fdl version 1. Torvalds specifically didnt follow with linux the free software foundations recommendation to describe a software project. Additionally, i am using the commercial license of emgucv which needs to be installed on the os for it to work also, appreciate ur opinion and time. We want to distribute our commercial closedsource software as a virtual appliance. The emacs general public license, a february 1988 version, a direct predecessor of the gnu gpl. If you need advice or assistance with integrating mpd in your product, contact me.
In addition, software may be published for ubuntu as a universal linux snap package, in which case licenses are determined by the snap publisher and documented in the snap store. List of finite element software packages wikipedia. But perceptions may not align with realities in this respect. Not establish proprietary rights in the software once you write it, everyone gets to enjoy it provide the source code or access to the source. Understanding the license that governs linux novell. Distributing commercial software on a linux virtual appliance, and. Its built with and comes with an awful lot of gpl d software. Torvalds specifically didnt follow with linux the free software foundations recommendation to describe a software project as governed by version 2 or any later. Intekron precision office automation webbased multiuser project accounting software preinstalled on a dedicated secured linux server. Most commercial applications are developed on the premise that the source is closed. Frequently asked questions about the gnu licenses gnu. A practical guide to gpl compliance software freedom law. Learn about different types of open source licenses and get answers to. Linuxwas released under the gnu general public license gpl.
Distributing commercial software on a linux virtual appliance, and the gpl closed ask question asked 9 years. Gpl violations related to combining zfs and linux software. By richard hillesley richard hillesley is a writer focusing on linux, free software and digital rights. Distributing commercial software on a linux virtual appliance, and the gpl closed we want to distribute our commercial closedsource software as a virtual appliance.
Linus torvalds has given linux kernel license to gnu general public license gpl version 2. Many of stallmans coworkers had left to form two companies based on software developed at mit and licensed by mit. Most gpl version 2 software is actually licensed as gpl version 2 or any later version, or. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and. Both licenses are in widespread use, and many people believe that the gpl is superior, citing linux as an example. One version is licensed under the gpl, while another is commercially licensedfor a fee, a company can have the restrictions of the gpl removed. If that commercial application is what youre selling, then youre giving a copy of that software in exchange for money. Despite the critical role the gpl plays in the advance of linux, not many people understand its terms. Just the fact that your application is running on top of a gpld kernel in no way affects the licensing of your software.
The linux kernel is licensed under the gnu general public license, version 2. Linux is an opensource kernel and usually comes bundled with free and opensource software. It keeps your code bona fide open source, so people who want to use and extend it noncommercially can do so without worrying about you at all. At the same time, it imposes very few obligations except on those who wish to. But the wording of both the license and the faq is misleading, and the suggestion that you can gpl your commercial software is disingenuous. If you have licensed software youve written under gpl version 2, and you are the original licensor of that software, you may wish to relicense your software under gpl version 3.
You can support our efforts by making a donation to the fsf. You cant, by default, license a copy of oracles database, and then. In reality, however, both licenses are good at fulfilling their original goals. Matlab fem and pde multiphysics simulation toolbox. Software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula youtube. Oracle offers a commercial license for all of its mysql software that is embedded in or bundled with another application. This is a guest post from exygys long time counsel joseph morris. If you sell a product with an embedded gpl software linux or sell a complete bootable image, you need to provide the source code for all that gpl software youre selling. The software that i am refering to is qgis which provides this description. Jun 29, 2007 free software foundation releases gpl 3.
The gnu general public license gpl is a pervasive free and open source software license. The effect of the gpl in the commercial world has been interesting. Jun 21, 2016 this is a guest post from exygys long time counsel joseph morris. Nov 08, 2015 software licensing gpl agpl bsd mit apache eula kris occhipinti. Not at allthere are many other free software licenses. Yolinux mail mta servers mail clients mail retrieval commercial and gpl.
For example, type the following command to find a copy of that file in your linux system for various items. Id like to incorporate gplcovered software in my proprietary system. The open source license under which asterisk is distributed is the gnu public license version 2 gplv2. The gpl is the worlds most popular open source software license, currently used by nearly 50% of all open source software, including such software as the linux. Lawsuit threatens to break new ground on the gpl and software. If you want an example of including gpld software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. Gpl, also known as copyleft, grants permission to reuse or modify the source code to make derivative works, but if you distribute your program to others, it requires you to license your derivative work under the gpl too. The following is a list of proprietary software for linux. The gpl code used in avi321 products is released without warranty and is subject to the of the corresponding author.
Commercial products running the music player daemon. List of linux security software tools commercial and gpl web client. We recently had a discussion about whether to recommend mit, apache, or gpl to one of our nonprofit clients for their open source project. The commercial license allows oems, isvs and vars to distribute commercial binaries of mysql software with their own commercial software without subjecting that software to the gpl and its requirement to distribute source.
For commercial licensees, all modules are available under a single, commercial qt license. Most of these opinions were formed in discussions on the debianlegal mailing list in response to questions from potential package maintainers or licensors. Aug 26, 2008 this is a guide to effective compliance with the gnu general public license gpl and related licenses. A copy of that license is included in this document on page x. For many users, the gplv2 license suits their use of asterisk completely.
Among other things, were often asking joe about software licensing issues. If you want an example of including gpl d software as part of a commercial offering, look at os x. The gpl is a useful tool for furthering the free software agenda, and the bsd license is a. You can distribute your application using a gpl library commercially, but you must also provide the source code. Here are some highlights of a few specific issues that come up occasionaly. Difference between different types of open sources licenses. Effects of licensing on the commercial software world. Opensource gpl is pacmanlike microsoft chairman bill gates plunges into the ongoing opensource tussle, saying there are problems for commercial users with the general public. In accordance with the software freedom law centers sflcs philosophy of assisting the community with gpl compliance cooperatively, this guide focuses on avoiding compliance actions and minimizing the negative impact when enforcement. Distributing commercial software on a linux virtual. This is a list of commercial products known to be based on mpd. Lawyers for commercial software vendors have feared a claim like this for essentially the entire 20oddyear lifetime of the gpl. The commercial success of linux proves that that is not the case.
They would further argue that their user code runs on several kernels and is not dependent on the linux kernel in. Why you should use a bsd style license for your open. Commercial software developers need not fear linux and the gpl that governs it. Why the gpl is incompatible with commercial software. At the same time, it imposes very few obligations except on those who wish to redistribute the software. Legal risks of open source gpllinux loadable kernel. The text of the gnu general public license gpl is in a file named copying in various directories in your linux system. Does distributing a nonfree driver meant to link with the kernel linux violate the gpl.
977 865 1017 1165 50 1054 1548 1501 376 1058 908 965 1241 1078 9 1478 1419 835 340 1077 511 1450 13 170 917 1076 891 1320 1564 122 501 546 610 1154 1454 124 1305 1292 512